Monday, June 17, 2019

Revelations of the third kind - The Bigelow/Mitchell 1996 letter emerges

Background

Recently, on 15 June 2019, on his Facebook page, Canadian researcher Grant Cameron, published a statement:

"For some time now Richard Dolan has encouraged me to become involved in the story of the two leaked UFO documents. I have resisted but Monday morning I will enter the game and make a posting. 

I will post a third document that will begin to explore where these documents came from and what is going on."

The document has now been released by Cameron.

Introduction

In this post, I want to take a look at this third document. It is a three page letter, dated 13 May 1996, from Robert Bigelow, and addressed to Edgar Mitchell. However, it is clear from the last paragraph of page two, that the letter was sent to all members of the National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS) Science Advisory Board (SAB.)

Bigelow letter page one



The letter opens with:

"Since a lot has happened in the past few weeks, I thought I would take this opportunity to give you a brief update and provide information about the next meeting. You will remember that it is scheduled for the evening of May 31st and the entire day of Saturday, June 1st."

My comment:

In Vallee's book "Forbidden Science: Volume Four," (FSV4) in a diary entry dated 1 June 1996, Vallee writes that he attended the fourth meeting of the NIDS SAB, in Las Vegas.

Bigelow next advises that "One of your members, Jim Whinnery has agreed to address his research on loss of consciousness which encompasses more than twenty years of intense investigation."

My comment:

FSV4, on page 314 notes:

"This fourth meeting...was excellent, thanks to three separate presentations led by General Jim Whinnery. He showed videos of pilots losing consciousness in centrifuges and in actual cockpits..."

The letter then follows with:

"He will be followed by Melvin Morse, a medical doctor who has written several books about near-death experiences..."

My comment:

"The other presenters (one by Edgar Mitchell) also touch on the near-death experience..." writes Vallee on page 314.

Bigelow letter page two 

On page two of the Bigelow letter, Bigelow writes:



"Since the last SAB meeting we have engaged in metallurgical analyzes of selected samples... The process has enabled NIDS to establish a working relationship with Los Alamos National Laboratory..."

My comment:

From FSV4, "The implants from the last session have now been analyzed at Los Alamos."

The Bigelow letter then refers to Phil Corso, and the fact that John Alexander, then a NIDS employee, had spent some time in Washington conducting a background check on Corso.

My comment:

FSV4 on page 307 in a diary entry dated 3 May 1996, states that John Alexander had been in Washington conducting a check on the background of Corso.

Paragraph three, of page two of the letter refers to:

 "The German contact we mentioned at the last meeting. Illobrand von Ludwiger...I have suggested a project to him...We can anticipate that we will be informed about current sightings in central Europe. I also gave his organization a $5,000 contribution."

My comment:

On page 300 of FSV4, diary entry dated 31 March 1996:

"The Institute has also connected with Illobrand von Ludwiger, who investigates abductions in Germany and Austria."

The last paragraph on page 2 includes:

"Enclosed is a copy of an article provided to us by your colleague, SAB member Edgar Mitchell. In addition we note that his new book, The Way of the Explorer is now out in book stores. We are sending you a copy."

My comment:

This paragraph, indicates to me that although the letter was addressed to Edgar Mitchell, it did in fact go out to all SAB members.

Bigelow letter page three



Finally, Bigelow provides a list of scheduled meetings for the NIDS SAB for the rest of 1996. These were on Aug 2-3 (5th); Oct 4-5 (6th) and Dec 6-7 (7th.)

My comment:

A check with FSV4 reveals that it places Vallee in Las Vegas on Aug 3 for the fifth NIDS SAB meeting. However, a check of FSV4 reveals that the sixth meeting did not occur until 10 January 1997, and the seventh meeting not till 9 March 1997.

In summary

The reason that I am comparing the contents of the May 1996 Bigelow letter to Vallee's diaries, only published in January 2019, is to show that the two match in close detail. Thus one can reasonably conclude that the NIDS letter of 13 May 1996 is the genuine thing.

In my opinion, the reason that Grant Cameron has provided us with this letter from Bigelow to Mitchell, is to again focus the debate on the fact that the three released documents; i.e. the Davis/Bigelow memo of 23 March 2001; the Davis/Wilson notes of 16 October 2002, and this latest third document from 13 May 1996, all come from the files of the late Edgar Mitchell.

9 comments:

  1. It's my guess that Bigelow is the contractor for the reverse engineering of these craft. Moreover the mention of "metallurgic analysis of samples" obtained makes me believe it even more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's your guess on why they were studying the near death experience research? Why would UFO guys study that? Hmmm. many more questions here keith.....Thanks for your work!

      Delete
  2. What a load of crap..The never ending circle jerk..If you think this confirms anything but Bungalow has an interest in the topic, Edgar has always been out there, and fan boys like Grant Cameron and his bird feather apparitions are a joke; than you are mistaken. Can you do a blog on Grant's spoon bending next? Or head of National Space Agency Joe Firmage?

    TTSA has done such great work and you tards just keep jerking the same teets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, you put it much better than I could

      Delete
    2. Appreciate your work on all this Keith. So what else is still with Cameron's Lawyer? I think it will all come out in good time anyway. Just a shame that people cant use just a few of their analytical brain cells and realise what all this means, like the belligerent comment above. Disappointing.

      Delete
    3. Why are you so hostile to the release of this information? The documents are legitimate, the phenomenon is legitimate, and the people are legitimate. So, what's your beef here?

      Delete
    4. I think it's a knee jerk reaction to them realizing that people in the highest levels of government realize that the mind does not equal brain, that the near death experiences are being studied by some of the same people that make up TTSA now or at least advise TTSA. They are going to eat their hats when they realize that the god damn machines they want so badly dont exist in consensus 3d reality. Go back to the eighties you lamos. For fuck sakes guys go somewhere else. Do you realize how much work Keith puts into this stuff? Ungrateful shits. Anonymous cowards.

      SOrry rant over. They can crawl back to their anonymous cowardly corner.

      Delete
  3. Thanks Keith, building a working hypothesis is not easy or a perfect science.
    Keep doing what you are doing. doug

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great Job Keith, accurate and insightful.

    ReplyDelete

"Gone fishing" - on a break

In September 2017, I wrote a blog post "How to Research the UFO Phenomenon and Stay Sane."  I laid out my philosophy in eight poin...