People have asked me how I have kept my interest alive across a 50 year time span of research? I thought
about this again recently and came up with a few ideas which I’d like to share
with you.
Have some guiding
principles
One of my main guiding principles has been, to simply 'follow
the facts.' If a UAP case turns out to have a mundane explanation, then I say so! I believe that UAP investigators should weed out as many
identified cases as possible, leaving only good quality “unknowns” to work
with.
I have found this consistency of approach to be invaluable.
It can however, lead to differences of
opinion with other UFO researchers who have a non-negotiable belief system.
One example of this, occurred after I appeared on an ABC
television program, which discussed various medical issues. I suggested on the show that some UAP abductions
have their roots in terms of 'sleep paralysis.' A well known Victorian UFO
researcher took me to task for daring to suggest an alternative explanation
to the 'Grays.' I had, after all, only based my opinion on personal research, while his views arose from armchair research.
Another example, based on exhaustive research, was my
suggestion that the 1988 Mundrabilla car encounter had an alternative
non-extraterrestrial explanation. Some American researchers took a dim view of
this suggestion, even though they had conducted no first hand investigations.
I have now undertaken over thirty cold case reviews of Australian events. Some of these reviews have suggested alternative, mundane explanations, while others have strengthened the possibility of a truly unknown phenomenon.
Tackle diverse
research projects
The range of research projects which I have conducted over
the years has included:
- The possible application of the fantasy-prone personality, and hypnagogic imagery to UFO abductions. I had thought that support for the FPP hypothesis had declined, but an examination of seven studies conducted since the early nineties revealed three positive and four negative findings
- I asked the question 'could reports of 'angel hair” falls be simply spiders’ web?' and found
evidence to suggest that almost all reports are just that
- I conducted the only
comprehensive literature review ever undertaken on the subject of alien
implants. This revealed that very little peer review research had been
conducted
- I took a long, hard look
at the possible application of sleep paralysis to abductions, which made
me conclude that most UAP researchers underestimate its relevance
- A 12 month joint project with Melbourne based researcher Paul Dean, to collect and examine 12 months worth of Australian sightings.
All of these projects developed my knowledge in many areas;
made me question various approaches and ended up with me publishing articles
across the UAP literature for others to discuss and debate.
Read widely
I read a lot of different books and magazines, and browse
the internet frequently. My reading covers diverse topics such as astronomy,
biology, physics, the paranormal, mathematics and biographies to name just a
few. I find this keeps my mind active. When reading I always try
and link the information I come across to UAP research.
For example, I once read a book about the search for weapons
of mass destruction in Iraq. A portion of a single page mentioned UAP research
within the intelligence area of the Australian Department of Defence. This
ultimately lead to the release of a formerly secret intelligence file on UAP. This file may now be viewed on the National Archives of
Australia website.
Don’t separate
research into UFOs from research into the paranormal
In my opinion you shouldn’t just study UAP. UAP appear to be part of a much broader area of investigation which we label as the 'paranormal.' In my opinion, much is to be learnt by researching these two topics as
one. For example, the after-effects of some UAP close encounters
include a range of effects labelled paranormal, such as poltergeist activity.
Also, scientific studies on the topic of out-of-body
experiences are relevant to abductions. Science has now been able to create
OBEs on demand, by stimulating the human brain. It also has, in the laboratory,
successfully demonstrated that one’s sense of self can be transferred to a
point outside the body. For various research articles see my blog which I maintained on these topics between 2009 and 2014.
Take frequent
breaks from research
I’ve taken a number of breaks from researching UAP. I think
the longest was for four years. Breaks, particularly long ones, enabled me to
escape the day to day routine of UAP investigations. This gave me time to
reflect. It was during such breaks that I developed insights into how
the fantasy-prone personality, and hypnagogic imagery may relate to UAP.
Like Kylie Minogue, Madonna and Lady Gaga, reinvent yourself from time to time
At various stages over 50 years of my interest, I have been:
- One of the Co-ordinators
for the Australian Centre for UFO Studies
- Research Director for UFO
Research SA Inc.
- Founder of the Australian Centre for UFO Abduction Studies
- Continental Director for
the US Based Mutual UFO Network
- Facilitator for Disclosure Australia.
Each of these roles brought me into contact with a range of
different individuals, and taught me new skills.
Publish your
research
I find no value in coming up with some valuable insights and
then not telling anyone about them
I would urge you all to run your own website; make
documentaries; publish your own blog, or write for UAP magazines.
Publishing opens up your work to peer review, which ensures debate and discussion. Speaking of publishing your work, if you’d like to see what I have published over the years, then Google 'Keith Basterfield UFO.'
Publishing opens up your work to peer review, which ensures debate and discussion. Speaking of publishing your work, if you’d like to see what I have published over the years, then Google 'Keith Basterfield UFO.'
Don’t be afraid to
respectfully disagree with other researchers, whoever they might be
David Jacobs is a US abduction researcher with some
controversial viewpoints, some of which I have strongly disagreed with. I have
debated some of his ideas in print. Likewise, back in the 1980’s and 90’s I found much to
disagree with Whitley Strieber and documented my observations in print, e.g. The International UFO Reporter.
Some time ago, my thoughts on former astronaut EdMitchell’s revelations about ETs, even made the pages of the Tehran, Iran daily
newspaper!
I have outlined my views, in various places, on the inadequate
research we have collectively undertaken on the UAP abduction phenomenon.
Interestingly, some people in the US and UK have/are following up lines of
research suggested, in part by me.
Long term blog readers, will also be aware that I proposed an alternate conventional hypothesis for the 6 April 1966 Westall, Victoria, Australia sighting. I pointed out that there is almost no hard data available. There is no analysis of reported ground traces. There is no evidence of radar detection of the object. There are no documents about the sighting to be found in any Australian government file. The witnesses' observations are not well documented from the era, e.g. there are no entries from a 1966 diary. Much of the shared information only came to light since around 2006. Researchers have failed to acknowledge that human memory is prone to errors. No government employees have come forward to say they were involved in a cover up of the incident. Even the legendary US researcher, James E McDonald, following a personal investigation of Westall, failed to promote it as an excellent example of UAP.
Finally
You cannot retain a long term interest in any topic, without
thinking that the subject of your study has some merit.
I would however, make a couple of general observations:
- I think that examples of
the 'true' or 'core' UAP are much rarer than most researchers think. At one stage in South Australia I led a group of
investigators, who for three years examined several hundred local UFO
reports, and found that 95% of them could be explained in mundane terms.
Today if you look at large numbers of incoming reports, as listed on
Australian groups’ websites only some 10% are said to be IFOs. I believe
that if sufficient, open minded resources were given today to
investigations, that the clear up rate would still be about 95%
- I am still not convinced
that the phenomenon has a simple explanation, such the extra-terrestrial hypothesis.
In conclusion, after 50 years of research, I still believe
that the phenomenon contains genuine mystery, worthy of continued
scientific study.
Update as at 31 December 2017.
As I practice what I preach, despite all the recent news re a formerly secret Pentagon study, I am taking an indefinite break from UFO research. I expect to return at some future date, refreshed and full of new ideas. Till then, bye.
Update as at 31 December 2017.
As I practice what I preach, despite all the recent news re a formerly secret Pentagon study, I am taking an indefinite break from UFO research. I expect to return at some future date, refreshed and full of new ideas. Till then, bye.
Excellent, now this is the best article I have come across in 7 years of UAP investigations. Thank you for bringing all this information forward and I hope more people can accept your research as valid. Wow, I totally agree with you!!!
ReplyDeleteExcellent article! I will only address your final comments. I agree with your 95% to 5% statistics as being reasonably accurate. In my mind the 95% becomes 100% chaff that is no interest to me. It's the 5% that becomes 100% of something that I have great interest. It is a matter that deserves serious scientific study, and something it is not getting.
ReplyDeleteHi Charles and Larry,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments.
Hi Keith,
ReplyDeleteI commend you for the half century you have devoted to uncovering the UAP/UFO conundrum. I salute you!
I am focusing my PhD dissertation in systematic theology on the demonic nature of ET/UAP/UFOs. As you rightly recommended, I have acquired countless resources and have searched far and wide in an effort to make sense of this phenomenon. In my case, I seek to explain this from a biblical perspective, what the Christian community would call fringe theology. I am confident I can make a compelling case from many different angles, i.e.,: historical, biological, archeological, anthropological, cosmological, scientific (quantum physics, electric universe model), technological (quantum computing), psychological, and spiritual. I would value the opportunity to talk shop and compare notes. Let me know if you're interested in connecting! My email is stevejlatham@hotmail.com.
Cheers mate,
Steve
Hi Steve,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your welcome comments.