Many researchers have submitted US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) using keywords "UFO;" UAP;" AATIP;" and "AAWSAP." A backlog of FOIA requests has been cited by the DIA as the reason for their inability to respond to the majority of those requests. The United States Navy (USN) on the other hand, has been comparitively quick to respond to such requests directed at them.
Since 2016, a very small number of UAP researchers have submitted FOIA requests to the USN, using keywords such as "unidentified aircraft;" "UFO;" "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena"(UAP;)
and "Anomalous Aerial Vehicle."
The purpose of this post is to take a look at the known requests and document the results, all in one place. There may well be other individuals, of whom I am not aware, who have submitted similar requests. If any reader knows of such requests, I would appreciat hearing from you.
The Scientific Coalition for Ufology (SCU) published a report titled "A Forensic Analysis of Navy Carrier Strike Group Eleven's Encounter with an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle." In this report, the SCU advised that they filed 26 FOIA requests, which included a number to the USN, starting in December 2016. This was a year before the famous New York Times article revealed the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and discussed the November 2004 USS Nimitz encounters.
Negative responses to the USN FOIA requests, by SCU, came from:
1. Commander Naval Surface Force US Pacific Fleet.
2. Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division.
3. Commander Naval Air Force Pacific.
4. Office of Naval Intelligence.
5. Commander United States Pacific Fleet.
6. Naval Inspector General.
On 26 April 2019 US researcher John Greenewald, of The Black Vault, submitted an FOIA request to the USN, for "All emails sent to/from (or cc'd or bcc'd) Joseph Gradisher, spokesperson for Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare, which included the following keyword "UFO" and/or "unidentified aircraft."
The response, dated 28 June 2019 from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, advised the finding of two records totaling sixty three pages, responsive to the request.
In a blog post dated 27 August 2019 I analyzed the contents of these emails. Many of them dealt with requests for information from various media orgaizations.
There were a number of US DoD individuals mentioned as addressees, including Admirals, Vice Admirals and one John F Stratton, a US NIMITZ OPINTELCEN senior analyst.
Information new to me which I found in the emails included:
1. It was the US Navy Office of Legislative Affairs which organised the Congressional briefings by Naval Intelligence officials.
2. Vice Admiral Kohler briefed the Senate Armed Services Committee's, Seapower subcommittee in December 2018.
3. There was an email from Stratton to B Lyn Wright SES USN DCNO N2N6:
"The US Navy is at the forefront of this effort but works across the Department of Defense to ensure other service partners maintain awareness for the safety of their aviators. The US Navy is not working with any entities outside of the US government."
On 9 July 2019, John Greenewald also submitted another FOIA request, for a "copy of records, electronic or otherwise all emails to/from/cc'd/bcc'd Joseph Gradisher and Politico reporter Bryan Bender."
The response came from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and identified two records, totaling two pages, responsive to the request.
Essentially, on 20 June 2019, Bender was provided with the following statement:
"Navy officials did indeed meet with interested congressional members and staffers on Wednesday to provide a classified brief on efforts to understand and identify these threats to the safety and security of our aviators. Follow up discussions with other interested staffers are scheduled for later today (Thursday, 20 June.) Navy officials will continue to keep interested congressional members and staff informed. Given the classified nature of these discussions, we will not comment on the specific information provided in these Hill briefings."
In addition, also dated 9 July 2019, John Greenewald submitted another FOIA request, which requested "Copy of records, electronic or otherwise all emails to/from/cc'd/bcc'd CAPT CHINFO Gregory Hicks and Politico reporter Bryan Bender."
On 20 August 2019 the Department of Navy's Office of the Chief of Naval Operations responded. In part this read:
"The CHINFO Office has identified nine records totaling 15 pages that are responsive to your request..."
Greenewald released the partially redacted 15 pages of records. They indicate discussions between Bender and Hicks, with a date range 19 February 2019 and 23 April 2019. In these emails, Bender mentions his knowledge of "a directive/instruction establishing a process by which pilots and other personnel can report sightings of unexplained craft. .." and "...more recent reports of so-called "unexplained aerial phenomena" from the Theodore Roosevelt battle group during a cruise in 2015-2016, as well as more recent reports of highly advanced craft near Pax River."
Hick's official response came dated 23 April 2019:
"Bryan - here is our official response. Let me know if there is something else you'd like to explore on this, although folks around here will not go much further.
"There have been a number of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years. For safety and security reasons, the Navy and the USAF takes these reports very seriously and investigates each and every report. As part of this effort, the Navy is updating and formalizing the process by which reports of any such suspected intrusions can be made to the congnizant authorities. A new message to the fleet that will detail the steps for reporting is in draft.
In response to requests for information from Cogressional members and staff, Navy officials have provided a series of briefings by senior Naval Intelligence Officials as well as aviators who reported hazards to aviation safety."
US researcher Christian Lambright submitted an FOIA request to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) on 28 October 2019 and asked for:
"...all releasable portions of records and reports related to investigations of the detection of and encounter(s) with Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) by personnel involved with the Nimitz Carrier strike group (CSG) operating off the western coast of the United States during the period of approximately 10-16 November 2004."
Part of the response, dated 9 December 2019, from ONI, was as follows:
"ONI has searched our records for responsive documents. We have discovered certain briefing slides that are classified TOP SECRET. A review of these materials indicates that are currently approriate Marked and Clasified TOP SECRET under Executive order 13526, and the Original Classification Authority has determned that the release of these materials would cause exceptionally grave damage to the National Security of the United States...For this reason, the materials are exempt from release under the (b) (1) Exemption for Classified Matters of National Defense. As a result these records may not be released and are being witheld.
We have also determined that ONI possesses a video classified SECRET that ONI is not the original Classification for. ONI has forwarded your request to Naval Air Systems Command to make a determination on releasability."
I checked with Christian Lambright, and as at 23 March 2020 he was still awaiting a response from Naval Air Systems Command.
In a The Black Vault post dated 29 January 2020, John Greenewald reported on three more FOIA requests:
1. On 26 April 2019 DON-NAVY-2019-006271 asked the USN for the Navy UAP reporting guidelines. The request was denied on 7 January 2020.
2. On 29 April 2019 a request was made for "all briefing materials, which would include but not limited to, all written material, reports, documents, transcripts, minutes, briefng documents, list(s) of attendeees at the briefing(s) etc." The request was denied, on the grounds that all responsive material was classified.
3. A request dated 9 July 2019 for a "background paper" mentioned in the June 2019 release of internal Naval emails. This was also denied.
"As a member of the CEO's strategy team, Mr Stratton will lead, direct, assist, and develop efforts in existing contracts and the creation of new areas of business related to Scientific and Technical Intelligence...Most recently he was the first Director of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force..."
The website for Radiance Technologies states under the heading "What we do" as Intelligence, Cyber, Directed Energy, Artificial intelligence/machine learning, Microelectronics, Hypersonics, Space.
Update: 11 July 2022
In a Tweet dated 10 July 2022, Swedish researcher Roger Glassel provided details of questions he posed to the US Pentagon, concerning John F. Stratton; and the Pentagon's responses.
Glassel wrote to Susan Gough at the Pentagon:
It has been reported that former head of UAPTF, John Stratton, also was involved in the AAWSAP/AATIP effort.
Was John Stratton involved in the AAWSAP/AATIP program?
What role did John Stratton have in the AAWSAP/AATIP program?
As Stratton worked for the Navy, I will also CC Mr Gradisher.
The Pentagon response was as follows:
"Mr Stratton departed DIA to return to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) prior to the AAWSAP contract being awarded. In his role as first deputy director, then later director, Air Warfare in ONI, he was responsible for idnenifying and analyzing any and all potential threats to Naval Aviation, including emerging technologies. In those roles, he remained in contact with DIA while AATIP/AAWSAP existied, occasionally providing expertise and facilitating relationships between DoD, the intelligence community and industry contacts. However, he had no management role in the AAWSAP contract."
So has anyone yet tried to FOIA for the emails of people like Vice Admiral Kohler or FOIA for the emails of the people on that seapower subcomittee? Maybe some of those people also spoke about UAPs/UFOs in their emails and more details could emerge that way?ReplyDelete