Another Hearing
Previously, I have reported on a number of U.S. Congressional Hearings on the subject of UAP. Now, one more such Hearing has been announced, to be held on 9 September 2025. A 3 September 2025 Press Release advised that the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets would hold a hearing titled "Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection." This Task Force falls under the House of Representative's Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Witness list
The witness list for this Hearing, is as follows:
* Jeffrey Nuccetelli, Air Force Veteran
Involved in a UAP sighting in 2003, at Vandenberg Air Force Base, where a massive red square was reportedly above one of the launch pads.
* Chief Alexandro Wiggins, UAP witness
Radar specialist aboard the USS Jackson. In 2023, had an encounter with four UAP which seemed to come out of the ocean
* George Knapp, UAP journalist
George needs no introduction to readers of this blog
* Dylan Borland, UAP witness, Air Force Veteran.
Worked for the USAF as a Geospatial Intelligence analyst; four years with aerospace company BAE Systems; and six years with Intrepid Solutions and Services LLC.
Watch
To watch the livestream of the Hearing, click here.
Comment:
I will voice what some others have said after learning of the witness list. With no offence to any of the four individuals listed above, these are not the high powered; game changing; first hand witnesses which need to be heard from. In my opinion, we need to hear directly from such people as William Neil McCasland; Thomas Wilson, and James T. Lacatski, who need to be subpoenaed to testify under oath.
Update: 10 September 2025
For their written statements see below:
* Nuccetelli click here.
* Wiggins click here.
* Knapp click here.
* Borland click here.
There was an additional, fifth witness, Joe Spielberger, Senior Policy Counsel, Project on Government Oversight, click here.
There was also a video shown of an object being hit by a missile, off the coast of Yemen in 2024, which sparked a lot of interest among the UAP research community. Immediately, debate started up that the object was simply a balloon. Others disagreed.
