tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post8867891571629853080..comments2024-03-21T08:16:46.130+10:30Comments on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena - scientific research: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics - UAP studyKeith Basterfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05367372091711887711noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-11797241172989499632014-08-30T18:01:28.928+09:302014-08-30T18:01:28.928+09:30Ps...I probably don't need to mention, but jus...Ps...I probably don't need to mention, but just for anyone else reading this, both the RB-47 and Lakenheath cases have evolved significantly since these papers were written. In terms if RB-47 see, for example, papers by Brad Sparks and, from a sceptical point of view, by Tim Printy, both of which add to the overall picture.<br /><br />Lakenheath is far more complicated than it appeared even by 1971...Anthony Muganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500170864254300321noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-41049383224612499382014-08-30T17:21:30.856+09:302014-08-30T17:21:30.856+09:30Hi
Not quite the original journal but both the McD...Hi<br />Not quite the original journal but both the McDonald and Thayer papers can be copied from the ufo evidence.org <br />website.<br />If you do a Google search on Thayer 1971 UFO encounter II etc they will show up ( pasting the link from my phone has rather defeated me this morning so apologies for the less than precise reference). Haven't found a copy of the Kuettner paper, sorry.Anthony Muganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500170864254300321noreply@blogger.com