tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post2493865066364898983..comments2024-03-21T08:16:46.130+10:30Comments on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena - scientific research: Identified? Another individual from the Green/Dolan interview - the "advisor"Keith Basterfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05367372091711887711noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-57956619590425690422019-09-22T16:58:43.967+09:302019-09-22T16:58:43.967+09:30Keith, the document in question that came from &qu...Keith, the document in question that came from "Dr Dan Burisch"<br />http://stealthskater.com/Documents/Burisch_3.pdf<br /><br />Richnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-19874281958128504412019-09-22T16:52:29.584+09:302019-09-22T16:52:29.584+09:30Keith - my two cents below. This may only be tang...Keith - my two cents below. This may only be tangentially relevant to your article above but thought I would put it out there.<br /><br />Around 2006/2007, the Godlike Productions Forum had a long-running and highly controversial thread centering on a man called Dan Burisch who claimed to be a maverick genetic scientist working alongside an ET scientist at Groom Lake. <br /><br />Burish posted a document, which may have been the one you refer to above, which claimed to a study of ET genetic material. OK, interesting! Via my job role at the time, I was able to have the document reviewed by several UK Biology tutors who taught at GCE A-Level (the qualification required for UK university entry).<br /><br />Their opinion was that the document was simply an amalgam of scientific phrases, which would look impressive to a layman such as me but was absolutely meaningless junk to them.<br /><br />Your article makes me wonder: was this the same document Kit Green refers to? Was this the same hoaxer(s)? I have a vague recollection that Dr Green was hovering around the fringes of the Dan Burisch discussions at the time. Richnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-74325409306566826672019-09-07T23:36:39.239+09:302019-09-07T23:36:39.239+09:30Tiny oddity to claim that Google was used to assis...Tiny oddity to claim that Google was used to assist in "the Hoax" . It would appear her look into the matter with Green was late 90's . Google was just getting off the ground then and would have been a rare source (but possible). Perhaps Google is used here a simpler way to say "Internet Search". Jim Barryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07124467914455212629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-58614605002119766052019-09-07T10:03:37.145+09:302019-09-07T10:03:37.145+09:30Robert, why are you assuming (or suggesting) that ...Robert, why are you assuming (or suggesting) that Griffin would be any kind of 'ufologist' or ‘UFO advisor’? <br /><br />The context of Green's remarks on the 'chairperson' — possibly identified by Keith as Griffin — concerns a meeting of a collegial group to which Green allegedly presented the mysterious ‘package of ‘materials’ ('a subgroup that [Green] was chairing at the National Academy of Sciences’), with Griffin having a look and giving a presumably expert opinion in terms of the ‘state of the art’ of genetics/medicine. <br /><br />It makes sense that Keith didn’t bother to ask Green, since obviously Green didn’t name the ‘chairperson’ outright (and could be suspected of having used the gender-neutral term in order to be discreet).Paul Craddickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01047492392555217863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-33588624818817172322019-09-06T09:01:45.551+09:302019-09-06T09:01:45.551+09:30Keith, two days ago I sent email to Dr. Griffin, a...Keith, two days ago I sent email to Dr. Griffin, asking if she is acquainted with Dr. Green, and if she has investigated or researched the subject of UFOs. So far, no reply.<br /><br />Does Green reply to queries about this? If so, then your detective work to dig out these names was not necessary.<br /><br />Robert Sheafferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15324537021429419111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-38802687274546787392019-09-04T09:59:44.122+09:302019-09-04T09:59:44.122+09:30Hi Robert; I am always ok with being mistaken. How...Hi Robert; I am always ok with being mistaken. However,<br />I understand that at least my suggestion re<br />Flickinger is correct. Perhaps you might like to seek a comment from Kit Green?<br /><br />Keith Basterfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05367372091711887711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-57587322633520756892019-09-04T09:40:21.237+09:302019-09-04T09:40:21.237+09:30While it's interesting that Keith may have ide...While it's interesting that Keith may have identified two of Dr. Green's UFO "advisors" or "mentors" - Don Flickinger and Professor Diane Griffin - there does not seem to be any "paper trail" linking either to UFOlogy in any way. Whereas if we consider those with defense department jobs or contracts who we know were involved in UFO and paranormal stuff - John Alexander, Ron Pandolfi, Hal Puthoff, etc. - they leave behind bread crumb trails a mile wide. So either these two were a rare breed of Stealth UFOlogists, or else Keith is mistaken. Robert Sheafferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15324537021429419111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-81689882424708187692019-09-04T00:31:16.149+09:302019-09-04T00:31:16.149+09:30Just speculating here, but if we hypothetically ta...Just speculating here, but if we hypothetically take Green's statements at face value, it seems pretty possible the 'mentor', perhaps Flickinger, and the hoaxer might be one and the same. At the least, it should not escape consideration, IMO, the original source of the info passed from the mentor, and the info relayed through the hoax, came from the same entity - and that's assuming Green is portraying an accurate accounting. Lots of things to be careful not to prematurely conclude in these kinds of sagas.Jack Brewerhttp://ufotrail.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-14263380334525713522019-09-02T08:00:12.943+09:302019-09-02T08:00:12.943+09:30This comment has been removed by the author.Jack Brewerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05778028283888927074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-79969627704195103002019-09-02T01:20:46.690+09:302019-09-02T01:20:46.690+09:30Looks like you are on a roll here with the clues i...Looks like you are on a roll here with the clues in the interview. Way to go. <br /><br />Keith, you wrote:<br />6. Are there any other individuals which are referenced, but not named, in Green's interview with Dolan?<br /><br />Yes. After Flickinger there is another mystery person promising access to secret programs. This person is described in Dolan's notes under "The Carrot Dangles Again"<br /><br />Dolan writes: <br />This new mentor was the chief scientist and senior medical officer of the “Futures” program, which was “an extremely high-level DOD committee” which in turn was tied to a major aerospace company.<br /><br />Jim Barryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07124467914455212629noreply@blogger.com