tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post1803023292119534335..comments2024-03-21T08:16:46.130+10:30Comments on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena - scientific research: Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena; and "anti-gravity"Keith Basterfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05367372091711887711noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-56810594258354013872022-01-04T15:58:29.949+10:302022-01-04T15:58:29.949+10:30Just an update since I dont see it mentioned. She ...Just an update since I dont see it mentioned. She died this summer. https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li?lud=4CF765EE88E7526FCBA619C30101F7E6trax0rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06655731826832210214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7040353126484409527.post-54561035094810103102019-02-24T19:24:47.731+10:302019-02-24T19:24:47.731+10:30Regarding Baker’s claim that ‘their result was NOT...Regarding Baker’s claim that ‘their result was NOT controversial’, the justification offered is far from sufficient. Passing peer review counts for something in terms of methods and theoretical intelligibility, but certainly does not indicate that the FINDINGS are not controversial. A lack of responses (if accurate) can mean any number of things. Very often, a paper advancing claims perceived as outlandish and, more significantly, unpromising by the relevant scientific community will simply be ignored. Given the obvious utility of the conclusion arrived at, widespread acceptance would likely have produced a flurry of publications, whereas silence (other than the dissenting publications) indicates a lack of interest, most likely due to a perception of fatal error.James Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17908724512379751192noreply@blogger.com